you're right, donna....
i will quantify the statement as 'not at birth' but as soon as i realised the problems this dog will face.
i have no doubt, robin, that this dog is loved and there are people in this world who will go to the ends of the earth to give the dog as normal a life as possible...
but i am a member of the right to die....for humans...and i have dominion over my animals...and i have the responsibility and honour to give them the best life i am able to give and also to give them an easy death when it's time.
it's horrific when we have to put animals down at a very young age....
but i think death is not always the enemy....the physiology of this dog.....tells me she is in discomfort and having a spinal problem myself....and not even to the extent this dog has, i wish sometimes someone would put me down, the pain can be horrific.
donna, yes, i could put that sweet baby to sleep and give her back to G'd.....where she will be pain free..
your key word to me.....is 'normal life as possible'.....to me, if the dog had been born without front or back legs, i could work with that and have seen a number of times....giving a dog as normal a life as possible.
but never would i want a dog to live in constant pain. never.
not all deformities hurt, donna....so it then becomes a moot point. of course, it's not the deformity, it's the pain that would decide something for me.
i don't have a dog that is perfect....and have had special needs dogs...but not ones who live a life of pain daily. i can't do that. and won't.
werecatrising....no, i don't think the dog is ugly, but i do think the condition is very painful...it would have to be, unless the nerves were dead, or there was no blood supply. and i think this dog probably has issues now....painful ones.
you're right, too, robin. i should qualify this statement as not euthanising at birth, but after a careful assessment once the problem came to light and i had researched the quality of life.