If you had to pick a commercial dog food based on the ingredients and guaranteed analysis, completely ignoring the company is comes from and their reputation, what would you choose?
Close, there are 3 of them. Here they are :smile: In all honesty, in a way you are actually not that far off. No own dock though, there's a third party preparing the catch before it ends up at Champion, Horizon or Nutram/Elmira. Question is, does it make a better performing dog food?1. When we hear "Fresh Lake caught Walleye," we all picture 2 Canadian Fisherman in their 25 foot Walleye boat arriving at the Orijen Production dock by noon daily, delivering their fresh Walleye. Is this really what happens?... I fear it probably isn't. But I WOULD like to know EXACTLY what it means.
Here's a few links to some nutrition pdf's and an ingredient library explaining various stuff. From the nutritionists at Nutram but it applies for all brands.2. How much do these "sexy" ingredients really matter to our Dogs. I mean, when I see "sun cured alfalfa," my eyes get huge. What does it do for my Dog?... hell, I don't know but any company that puts that in there must love my Dog.
I feed both EVO and Taste of the Wild. Love them. Fed Taste of the Wild all through that Diamond recall without a problem. I am not a fan of Diamond, but the food works good for my dogs so there. EVO (also not a fan of P&G) I am still testing out, but I am liking it a lot so far. I don't write a food off because of a "bad" company unless they do something I really find to be quite unethical (which has got to be pretty dang bad in my books) or if my dogs don't do well on their food.I'm not talking about "sexy" ingredients. I'm talking about what food you think has the best ingredients for dogs. For example, many people would consider EVO to have very good ingredients/analysis, lots of meat. But people don't recommend it because they don't trust the company that makes it.
So I'd like to hear about more foods like that, foods with good ingredients with or without "good" (because that may be subjective) companies behind them. Many people seem to only be recommending Fromm, Earthborn, Acana, and Orijen nowadays, and I'm wondering if it's because people consider the actual products the best of the best, or if it's because they are the only companies they trust.
I'm also not trying to say a good company is not important, I'm just curious how many foods we write off because we don't trust the company.
Hills, Nestle Purina, and Royal Canin all got in trouble and fined for price fixing in France. Nestle makes the Waggin Train chicken jerky treats that have injured and killed more pets than any of the other supposedly tainted jerky treats according to the Marketplace investigative news report "Fighting for Fido" and are still being currently made and sold. Purina has 487 consumer complaints on the consumer affairs website for making pets ill and mold/bugs found in their products and P&G has 323 complaints on the same website for their Iams products. I did not see similar consumer complaints for foods like Champion, Dr. Tims, Earthborn, etc.People not trusting Nestle (Pro Plan), Proctor & Gamble (Eukanuba & Natura) and Mars (Royal Canin) is without merit so yes good foods are written off.